By Zachary Atkins and Prentiss Willson
A Texas administrative law judge ruled that a taxpayer was not entitled to make an alternativ
A Texas administrative law judge ruled that a taxpayer was not entitled to make an alternative three-factor apportionment election under Article IV of the Multistate Tax Compact (Compact) for Texas franchise tax purposes. The Texas Tax Code requires taxpayers to use a single gross receipts factor to apportion taxable margin to Texas. The taxpayer filed refund claims in which it asserted its right to use the alternative three-factor apportionment formula set forth in the Compact to determine its franchise tax liability. Despite being a full member of the Multistate Tax Commission established by the Compact, Texas has taken the position that the three-factor apportionment election is not available to taxpayers because the franchise tax is not an income tax. Without addressing that argument, the administrative law judge concluded that Texas law governs and requires taxpayers to use the single gross receipts factor formula, affirming the Comptroller’s denial of the taxpayer’s refund claims. The Comptroller adopted the administrative law judge’s decision as written. Docket Nos. 304-13-1314.13, 304-13-1315.13 (Tex. State Office of Admin. Hearings, Apr. 9, 2013).
Eversheds Sutherland is an international law firm helping the Fortune 100, industry leaders, sector innovators and business entrepreneurs solve their biggest challenges and reach their business goals. Dedicated to unfaltering excellence in client service, we are known for our business savvy and industry intelligence, providing creative and custom solutions for each of our clients. Industry and business experience makes the difference for our clients.
Complete the fields below to send your briefcase via email. Separate multiple email addresses with semi-colons(;)