Select a locationselect a location


Non-Practicing Entity (NPE) Defense

Researchers at Boston University Law School have shown patent trolls cost legitimate businesses as much as $83 billion each year. For more information, click here.

Eversheds Sutherland undercuts non-practicing entities’ leverage with swift, cost-conscious and strategically sound responses to allegations of infringement.

Eversheds Sutherland works aggressively to avoid or mitigate the damage caused by non-practicing entities (NPEs). These patent holding companies and IP assertion entities—known colloquially as patent trolls—exist to game the patent process with an underlying threat of expensive litigation if their demands go unmet. Our team understands the demands NPEs make, as well as the pros and cons associated with the different strategies available to address them—from settlement based on a one-time license fee to decisive litigation. We collaborate with our clients to ensure that the legal solution fits with their long-term commercial interests and objectives.

Many of our IP attorneys have technical degrees and worked as researchers and engineers before becoming lawyers. This background enables them to assess the validity of the claims made by NPEs and to find both technical and legal flaws in the claims. Moreover, our technical experience helps our lawyers explain cutting-edge technologies to judges, juries, arbitrators or mediators, who sometimes lack the technical knowledge to understand the intricacies that can dictate the outcome of a case.

The NPE business model presumes that their targets desire to settle because of the potentially high cost associated with resisting their claims. Our approach to staffing NPE cases seeks to minimize costs to give our clients greater options for resolution. Staff and contract attorneys support our matters when appropriate, and we utilize legal project management (LPM) tools to increase efficiencies and minimize fees.

Why Eversheds Sutherland

Client-focused. Our attorneys focus on the commercial needs of our clients when developing NPE defense strategies. We can negotiate or litigate as the situation warrants, but the needs and desires of the client always drive the course of action.

Technical understanding. Many of our attorneys have advance technical degrees and have worked in our clients' industries as researchers and engineers. This gives them powerful insight into the technical aspects of claims brought by NPEs. Moreover, in litigation, we can explain detailed technological facts precisely, accurately and accessibly to judges, juries, arbitrators and mediators.

NPE insight. We have encountered certain NPEs and their attorneys more than once because their business model involves targeting numerous similarly situated businesses in order to make a profit. We can anticipate what to expect from them in future claims, and we use this knowledge to increase our clients' leverage in the matter.

Legal project management tools. We enhance our clients’ leverage against NPE claims by using legal project management (LPM) tools to increase efficiencies and hold down costs. Because many NPEs rely on the fear of expensive litigation to force target firms to settle, our efficient processes help balance the equation to our clients' benefit.

Flexible staffing. As a further measure to contain the costs of NPE defense, Eversheds Sutherland is flexible in its staffing of cases. When appropriate, we enlist contract attorneys to handle some aspects of the case. Other times, we will assign a competent associate with a lower billing rate than a partner to do as much of the work as is strategically sound. We always keep our clients’ preferences and budgetary constraints in mind when making staffing decisions.

Nuts and Bolts

Strategies Eversheds Sutherland employs in NPE defense cases include:

  • Seeking indemnification
  • Conducting an immediate search for prior art
  • Exploring possible change in venue
  • Leveraging the joint defense opportunities with other parties
  • Exploring a settlement that bears a reasonable relationship to defense costs

Clients include firms engaged in:

  • Electronic financial transactions
  • Radio broadcasting
  • Generation, transmission and distribution of utilities
  • Check processing
  • Electronics manufacturing
  • Semiconductor design
  • University research
  • Cable television
  • Medical devices

Take Action

Companies can avoid the expense, time and aggravation of drawn-out NPE challenges to their business activity by relying on Eversheds Sutherland’s experienced and efficient team of IP lawyers.

Our Story

Eversheds Sutherland is an international law firm helping the Fortune 100, industry leaders, sector innovators and business entrepreneurs solve their biggest challenges and reach their business goals. Dedicated to unfaltering excellence in client service, we are known for our business savvy and industry intelligence, providing creative and custom solutions for each of our clients. Industry and business experience makes the difference for our clients.

click to watch Videocast: FINRA’s 2016 Disciplinary Program:  “YUUUGE” Fines May Propel 2016 to Record-Setting Year
Videocast: FINRA’s 2016 Disciplinary Program:  “YUUUGE” Fines May Propel 2016 to Record-Setting Year
Washington, DC
Adam C. Pollet, Associate
Washington, DC
© 2017 Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Add this page to MYBRIEFCASE
Practices/Industries - Non-Practicing Entity (NPE) Defense
Save ChangesDownload MYBRIEFCASEClear All